This order allowed an application to amend the name of the third respondent. The court was satisfied with the affidavit stating sufficient cause was shown. The plaintiff was directed to implement the amendment. The matter was posted for case management.
Application to amend the name of the third respondent was allowed. Plaintiff directed to carry out amendment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Application No.6318 of 2023 in
C.S.No.851 of 2009 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
The learned counsel for the respondents/defendants has not raised any serious objection for allowing this application, which has been filed to amend the name of the third respondent.
This Court is also satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavit filed in support of this application, as sufficient cause has been shown. Accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for.
The learned counsel for the plaintiff is directed to carry out the amendment in terms of this order.
Post the matter for Case Management Hearing on 12.12.2023 and on that date, both the parties are directed to file a draft Case Management Schedule.
28.11.2023
rkm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the application to amend the name of the third respondent in the case.
Application
Respondents/Defendants
Plaintiff
Third Respondent
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
