Order in a suit permitting the plaintiff to produce six documents despite incomplete earlier disclosure, subject to objections on admissibility, relevance, and proof. The related application for document production is closed.
Application to produce documents allowed; related application for document discovery is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.Nos.5551, 1932 of 2022
A.Nos.5551, 1932 of 2022 in C.S.No.639 of 2019
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The defendant filed A.No.1932 of 2022 to call upon the plaintiff to produce the documents listed in paragraph 7 of the affidavit in support of the application. Pursuant thereto, the plaintiff has filed A.No.5551 of 2022 for leave to produce the six documents listed in the Judge's summons.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
1/2
A.Nos.5551, 1932 of 2022
rna
documents have been produced pursuant to the application filed by the defendant, reasonable cause is established to permit the plaintiff to produce these documents albeit subject to objections on the ground of admissibility, relevance and proof. Accordingly, A.No.5551 of 2022 is allowed by permitting the plaintiff to file the documents listed in the Judge's summons on the above terms. As a consequence, nothing further survives for consideration in A.No.1932 of 2022, which is closed.
07.02.2023 for recording further evidence.
31.01.2023
rna
A.Nos.5551, 1932 of 2022 in C.S.No.639 of 2019
2/2
Plaintiff
Defendant
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
