N.Ramamurthy v. N.Ethiraj (Since Died) 1.R.Padmavathy and 29 others
Case brief
What is this about?
Application to bring on record children in succession suit dismissed as no representation filed. Court directed cause title amendment to reflect dispute over marital status and fixed trial resumption date.
What the court decided
A.No.5495 of 2022 in C.S.No.510 of 2006
A.No.5495 of 2022 in C.S.No.510 of 2006
N.SESHASAYEE.J.,
The erstwhile counsel for the 1st defendant on instructions continues to make a statement that the 20th defendant is not a legally wedded wife of the 1st defendant and that his legally wedded wife is somebody else. In the meantime, the learned counsel for the plaintiff has taken out this application to bring on record the children of the 1st defendant.
2.Notice in this application has been served on the proposed respondents. No representation for them. This application is therefore allowed.
3.As and when the alleged legally wedded wife of the 1st defendant comes before this Court with necessary application, the Court will have an occasion to decide on the legal status of the 20th defendant.
4.The 20th defendant is recorded as the wife of the 1st defendant and other respondents are impleaded as heirs of the deceased 1st defendant.
A.No.5495 of 2022 in C.S.No.510 of 2006
Parties & counsel
- other
Plaintiff
Coram
N. Seshasayee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court