G.Jayabal v. R.Srinivasan
Case brief
What is this about?
A.No.511 of 2023 in C.S.No.96 of 2022…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.511 of 2023
A.No.511 of 2023 in C.S.No.96 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The sole defendant seeks condonation of the delay of 103 days in filing the written statement. On instructions, learned counsel for the plaintiff states that he has no serious objection to this application being allowed.
- Upon examining the affidavit in support and being satisfied that
sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed. Consequently, the
Registry is directed to receive the written statement of the defendant.
- List the matter on 03.03.2023. The parties are directed to file draft
issues.
15.02.2023
rna
1/2
Coram
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court