The single-judge court allowed an application to adduce secondary evidence for seven documents in a civil suit. Permission was granted subject to respondents' objections regarding admissibility, relevance, and proof.
Permission to adduce secondary evidence for seven documents granted, subject to objections on admissibility, relevance, and proof.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.4946 of 2022
in
C.S.No.42 of 2021
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
By this application, the plaintiffs seek permission to adduce
secondary evidence in respect of the seven documents described in the schedule to the Judge's summons.
1/2
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J kal
respondents to raise objections inter alia on grounds of admissibility, relevance and proof.
16.02.2023
kal
(½)
A.No.4946 of 2022
in
C.S.No.42 of 2021
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to adduce secondary evidence should be allowed regarding seven documents despite lack of proof of receipt for some.
Applicants
Respondents
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
