R.Vivek v. Lakshmi.S
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of an application for permission to speak with a minor child in the respondent's custody. It ordered video call access on Saturdays from 8:00 PM to 8:30 PM until further orders.
What did the court decide?
Provided video call access on Saturdays between 8.00 and 8.30 P.M. until further orders.
What the court decided
A.No.4658 of 2022
A.No.4658 of 2022 in O.P.No.631 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The father of the minor children has presented this application for permission to speak with the minor child Vihan, who is in the custody of the respondent.
- At the last hearing, learned counsel were directed to obtain instructions as to a convenient date and time for the said purpose. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the application, as framed, is designed to impede the effective prosecution of proceedings pending before the Family Court, Kerala. He also submits that the respondent denies all allegations made in the affidavit. Without prejudice, he submits that the respondent is agreeable to provide access to the child in her custody every Saturday for 30 minutes between 8.00 and 8.30 P.M on condition that similar access be provided to the respondent as regards the child in the custody of the applicant.
1/2
A.No.4658 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant's request for permission to communicate with the minor child in the respondent's custody should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Father of the minor children
- respondent
Custodial parent of Vihan
Coram
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court