The court allowed an application seeking an extension of six months to conclude arbitration proceedings, given that the previously mandated period had expired. The respondent raised no objection.
A further period of six months granted to conclude the arbitration proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Application No.414 of 2023
Application No.414 of 2023
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
The present Application has been filed to extend the period of arbitration between the applicant and the respondent, which concluded before the Arbitral Tribunal, by a further period of six months.
extension of time.
Application No.414 of 2023
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
asi
This Application is ordered accordingly.
01.03.2023
asi
Application No.414 of 2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the period of arbitration between the applicant and respondent should be extended by six months.
Unspecified Applicant
Unspecified Respondent
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
