Single judge order dismissing contention on development proposal. With no objection from respondent, application prayed for mulling sharing of income and construction terms was ordered as requested.
Application ordered as prayed for; parties bound to agree terms per 13.07.2022 proposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.3211 of 2022 in O.P.No.88 of 1960
Application No.3211 of 2022 in O.P.No.88 of 1960
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J
A.No.3211 of 2022 in O.P.No.88 of 1960 has been filed by one Vishal S.Ved to consider the proposal regarding the manner of development of the property and the division and appropriation of the rents to be derived as per the proposal submitted by the learned A.G. & O.T., dated 13.07.2022.
Page No.1 / 3
A.No.3211 of 2022 in O.P.No.88 of 1960
to make an application for planning permission before the authority concerned, who shall process and sanction the plan within a period of one month from the date of making such application. On getting proper sanction, the applicant is expected to complete the construction without any deviation/violation, within a period of 15 months from the date of sanction of the plan. It is reiterated that the construction should be in accordance with the plan that will be sanctioned.
22.02.2023
cs
Page No.2 / 3
A.No.3211 of 2022 in O.P.No.88 of 1960
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J
cs
A.No.3211 of 2020 in O.P.No.88 of 1960
22.02.2023
Page No.3 / 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application regarding manner of development of property and appropriation of rents should be granted given the agreement between parties.
Vishal S.Ved
A.G. & O.T.
Vaidyanathan, S.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
