Single judge passed an order in a civil application filed in C.S. No. 552 of 2019 (A. No. 2370 of 2023) for amendment of plaint consequent to impleading of new defendants. Court noted limitation issues may be dealt later.
Application for amendment of plaint allowed. Issues of limitation reserved for later trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R.N.MANJULA,J.
A.No.2370 of 2023 in
C.S.No.552 of 2019
This application has been filed to permit the applicants to amend the plaint by including the paragraphs 10A to 10H, substitute paragraph 11, amend paragraph 11 by including paragraphs 11V to 11XVI and including prayers in paragraph 12 from C to N in the plaint in the above suit.
Page No.1 of 2
amendment consequential to the impleading of D3 to D9, I feel the issue on the limitation can be dealt appropriately at a later stage after giving opportunity to the defendants to file written statement. If needed, the
question of limitation can also be framed as an issue and tried.
12.07.2023
gsk
A.No.2370 of 2023 in
C.S.No.552 of 2019
Page No.2 of 2
plaintiffs
defendants
R.N.MANJULA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
