In Civil No. 2128 of 2023, the court allowed an application to file additional documents, conditioning the order on proof and relevancy, noting the respondents had no objection.
Application allowed subject to proof and relevancy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2128 of 2023 in TOS.No.27 of 1995
R.N.MANJULA,J.
The applicants are the plaintiffs. This application has been filed to receive additional documents mentioned in the list of documents filed along with this application.
28.04.2023
gsk
Page No.1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for leave to file additional documents should be allowed.
The applicants (plaintiffs)
The respondents
R.N.MANJULA,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
