Eveready Spinning Mills Pvt. v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Case brief
What is this about?
Three writ petitions challenging restrictions on residential power supply during peak hours were disposed of by closing the petitions without any order, noting that the power crisis situation had resolved and supply is now uninterrupted.
What the court decided
W.P(MD)Nos.9682 to 9684 of 2009
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 04.04.2022
CORAM :
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)Nos.9682 to 9684 of 2009 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2(3) & 3(3) of 2009
Eveready Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its General Manager, 12, Jothi Theatre Road, Tirupur. : Petitioner in WP(MD)9682/2009 Mani Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. (Unit I), 12, Jothi Theatre Road, Tirupur. : Petitioner in WP(MD)9683/2009 Mani Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. (Unit II), (Formerly Fishers Spinning Mills (P) Ltd.,) 12, Jothi Theatre Road, Tirpur. : Petitioner in WP(MD)9684/2009 Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep. by its Chairman, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Chief Engineer / Commercial, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 3.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, Anna Salai, Chennai. 4.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tirunelveli Electricity Distribution Circle, Tirunelveli.
1/3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions seeking quashing of power rationing notices and direction for uninterrupted supply require any order given the changed position.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Eveready Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd.
- petitioner
Mani Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. (Unit I)
- petitioner
Mani Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. (Unit II)
- respondent
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court