Disposed

Muthusamy, v. the District Collector

Madras HC20 Oct 2022WP(MD)/9640/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In these writ petitions, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court closed matters where petitioners challenged eviction notices. The respondents submitted that encroachments had been removed, and no legal objection was offered by the petitioners' counsel.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were closed following the submission that encroachments had been removed, with no costs.

Muthusamy, Vs the District Collector — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD) Nos.9640 to 9645 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 20.10.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶8

W.P.(MD)Nos.9640 to 9645 of 2013

¶9

and

¶10

M.P.(MD)Nos.1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 & 2 of 2013

¶11

W.P.(MD)No.9640 of 2013:

Muthusamy

... Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, Virudhunagar.

¶16

2.The Executive Engineer,

¶17

Water Resource Organization Vaipar Basin Division, Public Works Department,

¶18

Virudhunagar.

¶19

3.The Junior Engineer,

¶20

Water Resource Organization, Vaipar Basin Division-II, Public Works Department, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶21

Page 1 of 4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.(MD) Nos.9640 to 9645 of 2013

¶24

PRAYER:

¶25

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the impugned order passed by the 3^rd respondent in his Proceedings Nil dated 05.06.2013 and quash the same.

¶26

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader

¶27

COMMON ORDER

¶28

[Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.]

¶29

Challenging the eviction notices issued by the 3^rd respondent in his Proceedings Nil dated 05.06.2013, the petitioners have filed filed these Writ Petitions.

¶30

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader has produced the written instructions of the Assistant Engineer, Water Resource Organization, Vaipar Basin Division-II, Sattur, Virudhunagar District, in Letter No.K:05/2022/cngh/ehs;:20.10.2022,

¶31

Page 2 of 4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD) Nos.9640 to 9645 of 2013

¶34

along with photographs and submitted that the entire encroachments in the place

¶35

in question have been removed.

¶36

3. The aforesaid submission of the learned Additional Government Pleader is not refuted by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Thus, recording the said submission, these Writ Petitions are closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶37

[R.M.D., J.] & [J.S.N.P., J.]

¶38

20.10.2022

¶39

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No vsm

¶40

Page 3 of 4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P.(MD) Nos.9640 to 9645 of 2013

¶43

R.MAHADEVAN, J. AND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶44

vsm

¶45

¶46

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, Virudhunagar.

¶47

2.The Executive Engineer, Water Resource Organization Vaipar Basin Division, Public Works Department, Virudhunagar.

¶48

3.The Junior Engineer, Water Resource Organization Vaipar Basin Division, Public Works Department, Sattur, Virudhunagar.

¶49

W.P.(MD)Nos.9640 to 9645 of 2013

¶50

20.10.2022

¶51

Page 4 of 4

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Muthusamy, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthusamy, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

F.Selvin Julius Vs the Commissioner

M.R. Gurumoorthi Vs the District Collector

Annamalai Vs the District Collector

Sudar Olivu Vs the Dist. Collector

Muthu Vs the District Collector

C.M. Adaikkan Vs the State Rep by