Rahini Ammal v. the Deputy Inspector Ogeneral
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as withdrawn upon requests and endorsement by counsel for the petitioner.
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as withdrawn upon requests and endorsement by counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.9584 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.09.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P(MD)No.9584 of 2014
Rahini Ammal
... Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take appropriate action against the respondents 4
1/4
W.P(MD)No.9584 of 2014
to 9, by disposing the petitioner's representation, dated 30.05.2014, as accordance with Section 83 of the Indian Registration Act.
For Petitioner : M/s.R.Suriya Narayanan For R-1 to R-3 : M/s.S.Jeyapriya Government Advocate For R-4 to R-9 : Mr.G.Anbu Saravanan
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court
to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
the writ petitioner, this Writ Petition is permitted to be dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
19.09.2022
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No btr
2/4
W.P(MD)No.9584 of 2014
To
3/4
W.P(MD)No.9584 of 2014
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
btr
Order made in W.P(MD)No.9584 of 2014
19.09.2022
4/4
Rahini Ammal
The Deputy Inspector General of Registration
The District Registrar (Administration)
The Sub Registrar
V.Sivabala Kannan
N.Ranjai
R. Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court