Dismissed

Arulmighu Peruvembudaiyar Sashtha Temple v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC19 May 2022WP(MD)/9406/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a withdrawal order in a writ petition by a temple. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one after impleading necessary respondents. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, subject to the grant of liberty to file a fresh petition.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action after impleading necessary parties.

Arulmighu Peruvembudaiyar Sashtha… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.9406 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.05.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD)No.9406 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD)No.6742 of 2022

¶3

Arulmighu Peruvembudaiyar Sastha Temple, Rep. by its Executive Officer, G.Venkateswari .. Petitioner

¶4

Vs 1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Tourism, Culture and Endowments, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 3.The Commissioner, H.R & C.E Department, Chennai. 4.The Joint Commissioner, H.R. & C.E Department, Tirunelveli. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 6.The Inspector of Police, Nanguneri Police Station, Nanguneri. 7.Rajakkal Mangalam Panchayat, Through its Executive Officer, Rajakkalmangalam, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 8.Sri Peruvembudaiyar Sastha Thirukoil, Annadhana Trust Rep. by its Founder K.Subramanian, Rajakkal Mangalam, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli. .. Respondents

¶5

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶6

1/3

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.9406 of 2022

¶8

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 forbearing the 8^th respondent from interfering the day to day affairs of the petitioner temple based on the representation of the petitioner dated 02.05.2022.

¶9

ORDER

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner has addressed a letter, dated 16.05.2022 to the Registry seeking the matter to be posted before this Court 'for withdrawal'. The learned counsel for the petitioner is also present before this Court today and seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. He would further submit that since the petitioner has not made the necessary parties as party respondents, the petitioner seeks liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the very same cause of action.

¶11

Recording the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner and his statement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the very same cause of action after impleading the necessary parties. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶12

¶13

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

2/3

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.9406 of 2022

¶17

¶18

1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Tourism, Culture and Endowments, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 3.The Commissioner, H.R & C.E Department, Chennai. 4.The Joint Commissioner, H.R. & C.E Department, Tirunelveli. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 6.The Inspector of Police, Nanguneri Police Station, Nanguneri. 7. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-23926[F] dated 20/05/2022 ) W.P.(MD)No.9406 of 2022 19.05.2022

¶19

SS/01.06.2022 : 3P/8C

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

3/3

Arulmighu Peruvembudaiyar Sashtha Temple v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arulmighu Peruvembudaiyar Sashtha Temple v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Johnsingh .a Vs The Director of School Eduction

Karuppiah Vs The Inspector of General of Registration

Erakkamuthu S Vs The District Collector

Sathya G Vs Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission

Rhea Clement Vs The Registrar

Arumugam Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer