Partly allowed
Vtm Limited, Rep. by Its v. the Unioin of India, Rep. by
Madras HCWP(MD)/9400/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Madras High Court held that while procedural compliance issues prevented quashing of the acquisition notification, compensation must be determined as of the date possession was taken. The petition was partly allowed with directions for compensation calculation.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was partly allowed. Direction was issued for respondents to determine and pay compensation to the petitioner as of 19.02.2003 with payment to be made within 12 weeks.