Disposed

Muthumani v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 May 2022WP(MD)/9221/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking an interim order to restrain coercive action against the petitioner's son pending +2 public examinations. The Additional Public Prosecutor undertook not to take such steps till the examination concluded.

What did the court decide?

The Additional Public Prosecutor undertook not to take coercive steps against the petitioner's son till the +2 public examination was over.

Muthumani Vs The Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD).No.9221 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.05.2022 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P(MD).No.9221 of 2022

¶4

Muthumani ... Petitioner Vs.

¶5

The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Trichy District.

¶6

...Respondent

¶7

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner's son, namely, Dheepak, S/o Kaliyamurthy in connection with the case in Crime No.119 of 2022 on the file of the respondent, till his +2 public examination from 05.05.2022 to 13.05.2022.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh pandian For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent herein not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner's son, namely, Dheepak, S/0 Kaliyamurthy in connection with the case in Crime No.119 of 2022 on the file of the respondent, till his +2 public examination from 05.05.2022 to 13.05.2022.

¶11

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that till the examination is over, the respondent police will not take any coercive steps against the petitioner's son. Once the examination is over, the Law enforcing agency will take steps in the manner known to law.

¶12

Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

¶13

Sd/-

¶14

Vacation Officer/ Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶15

// True Copy //

¶16

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶17

gbg/TM

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

W.P(MD).No.9221 of 2022

¶21

¶22

1.The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Trichy District.

¶23

The Additional Public Prosecutor,

¶24

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶25

+1 CC to M/s.M. JEGADEESHPANDIAN, Advocate ( SR-23687[F] dated 12/05/2022 )

¶26

W.P (MD).No.9221 of 2022 12.05.2022

¶27

SRR (CO) GC(19.05.2022) 2P 4C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

2/2

Muthumani v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthumani v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aaronkumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Nagaraj. a Vs The Superintendent of Police

Ganesan Vs The Inspector of Police

Esakkimuthu Vs The Inspector of Police

Prabhu Vs The Inspector of Police

Nagarani Vs The Inspector of Police