Dismissed
Er.P.Gayathri v. the Director General
Madras HCWP(MD)/6459/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.15978 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
W.P.(MD)No.6459 of 2021 and
W.M.P.(MD)No.5051 of 2020
P.Gayathri
... Petitioner
/vs./
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent vide proceedings Se.Mu.aa.No.1234/nir2(2)(2)/2016 dated
1/4
WP(MD)No.15978 of 2022
27.01.2021 in concerned with the portion of recovery proceedings alone and quash the same as illegal as devoid of merits and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to complete the verification of genuineness of the petitioner's community certificate within time frame as fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.Raja.Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.A.Sivanu Pandian Government Advocate
ORDER
The learned Counsel for the petitioner has addressed a letter to the Registry dated 05.07.2022, seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. The said letter is recorded.
2 . Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
25.07.2022
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sm 2/4
WP(MD)No.15978 of 2022
TO:
3/4
WP(MD)No.15978 of 2022
M.S.RAMESH, J.
Sm
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.6459 of 2021
Dated: 25.07.2022
4/4
P.Gayathri
The Director General, Highways Department, Guindy, Chennai
M.S.RAMESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court