Writ petition challenging an impugned notice was dismissed as infructuous because the respondents informed the court that the impugned notice had been withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to withdrawal of impugned notice. Liberty granted for fresh action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.[MD]No.6293 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.04.2022 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.[MD]No.6293 of 2022 and W.M.P.[MD]No.4909 of 2022
Karuppiah
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tamil Nadu Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
Sivagangai.
3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, District Collector Office Campus, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.
4.The Block Development Officer, Block Development Office, Kalaiyarkovil,
Sivagangai District.
... Respondents
P RAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notice passed by the second respondent vide office proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A7/0462/2022 dated 28.03.2022 and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy
for Mr.R.Karunanidhi
For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr.D.Sasikumar, Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 as well as learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the fourth respondent, on instructions would submit that the impugned notice has been withdrawn. Since the impugned notice has been withdraw, no further orders need to be passed by this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
W.P.[MD]No.6293 of 2022
2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the respondents, if so advised to initiate fresh action against the petitioner in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CO)
// True Copy //
/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
MR To 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Inspector of Panchayat / The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, District Collector Office Campus, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Block Development Office, Kalaiyarkovil, Sivagangai District. +1 CC to M/s.R. KARUNANIDHI, Advocate (SR-17660[F] dated 08/04/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-17942[F] dated 11/04/2022 )
W.P.[MD]No.6293 of 2022 08.04.2022
RK(26/04/2022) 2P 7C
2/2
Karuppiah
The Government of Tamil Nadu
The Inspector of Panchayat / The District Collector, Sivagangai District
The Assistant Director of Panchayat
The Block Development Officer, Kalaiyarkovil
Abdul Qudhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
