Dismissed

Chinnathambi .P v. The District Registrar

Madras HC28 Jun 2022WP(MD)/6261/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed this writ petition challenging a 2012 settlement deed. It held the petitioner has no locus to cancel the deed via writ and must approach the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act tribunal for appropriate relief regarding the dispute.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed; petitioner directed to move Maintenance Tribunal for relief on merits.

Chinnathambi .P Vs The District Registrar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

1 W.P.(MD)NO.6261 OF 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 28.06.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.6261 of 2022

P.Chinnathambi

... Petitioner

Vs.

The District Registrar, O/o.The District Registrar, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

¶11

The Sub Registrar, Velipattinam, Ramanathapuram District.

¶12

Arunachalasamy ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the settlement deed dated 02.02.2012 as Document No.767 of 2012 on the file of the second respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.03.2022.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan, Additional Government Pleader. For R-3 : No appearance. * * *

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/3

¶17

2 W.P.(MD)NO.6261 OF 2022

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2.

¶20

2 . The petitioner is the elder brother of the third respondent. He has executed the petition mentioned settlement deed in his favour. Now the petitioner wants the same to be cancelled. The learned Additional Government Pleader states that based on the petition mentioned document, the third respondent had made a further alienation.

¶21

3 . In the facts and circumstances of this case, the petitioner may have the remedy under the provisions of THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT. It is not possible for this Court to grant any relief in this writ petition. The petitioner is at liberty to move the Maintenance Tribunal for appropriate relief.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/3

¶24

3 W.P.(MD)NO.6261 OF 2022

¶25

4 . This writ petition stands dismissed. As and when such an application is filed, the same shall be disposed of by the jurisdictional Maintenance Tribunal on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. No costs.

¶26

28.06.2022

¶27

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No

¶28

PMU

¶29

To:

¶30

The District Registrar, O/o.The District Registrar, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

¶31

The Sub Registrar, Velipattinam, Ramanathapuram District.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

3/3

¶34

4 W.P.(MD)NO.6261 OF 2022

¶35

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

¶36

PMU

¶37

W.P.(MD)No.6261 of 2022

¶38

28.06.2022

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

4/3

Chinnathambi .P v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinnathambi .P v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A1382, Virudhunagar District Consumers Co-Operative Whole Sales Stores Ltd., Vs the Tamil Nadu Information Commission

Perumal .P Vs the Registrar Cum Commissioner of Milk

Kumar.P Vs The District Collector

Anthonyraj.S Vs the Inspector General of Registration

Z.637 Swamimalai Primary Agricultural Co.Op. Credit Society Ltd., Vs The Secretary to Government

M/s.Bala Vinayaga Blue Metals Vs The District Collector