Dismissed

M.K.Palani Asari v. the Dist. Collector

Madras HC15 Dec 2022WP(MD)/6039/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by M.K.Palani Asari seeking quash the impugned Peace Meeting proceeding and direct respondents to frame proper meeting or election proceeding. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to enter appearance despite notice.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

M.K.Palani Asari Vs the Dist. Collector — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD). No. 6039 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 15.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

W.P(MD). No. 6039 of 2020 and W.M.P(MD). Nos. 5204 and 5205 of 2020

M.K.Palani Asari

... Petitioner

-vs-

The District Collector, Collector Office, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

¶11

The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Tiruchendur, Tuticorin District.

¶12

The Inspector of Police, Kulasekarapatnam, Tuticorin District.

¶13

Village Administrative Officer, Village Administrative Office, Udangudi, Tuticorin District.

¶14

5. A. Velraj

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P(MD). No. 6039 of 2020

¶18

6. K.Manthiram

¶19

A. Ganesan

¶20

V. Sivamurugan ... Respondents

¶21

Prayer:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records to the impugned Peace Meeting proceeding dated 12.03.2020 in Na.Ka.No.A3/1540/2020 of the Second Respondent and quash the same and thereby direct the First and Second Respondents to frame proper meeting/ election proceeding of Viswakarma Community Members of Vaithiyalingapuram, Udangudi, Tuticorin District, on the basis of representation given by the petitioner dated 16.03.2020, within stipulated time.

¶22

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr. P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader for R1, R2 and R4 Mr. G.R.Sathish for R5 to R8 Ms. M.Asha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R3

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

In furtherance to the order passed by this Court on 23.09.2022, notice

¶25

ordered to the Petitioner to appear on 07.10.2022. Despite service of notice, the Petitioner has not entered appearance though his name is printed in the cause list.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

W.P(MD). No. 6039 of 2020

¶29

As there is no representation for the Petitioner even today, the Writ

¶30

Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

¶31

15.12.2022

¶32

Index: Yes/No pkn Note: Issue order copy by 28.12.2022.

¶33

¶34

The District Collector, Collector Office, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

¶35

The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Tiruchendur, Tuticorin District.

¶36

The Inspector of Police, Kulasekarapatnam, Tuticorin District.

¶37

Village Administrative Officer, Village Administrative Office, Udangudi, Tuticorin District.

¶38

Copy to

¶39

M.K.Palani Asari D.No. 17/1A2, Pudhumanai New Street Udangudi – 628 203. Tuticorin District.

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

3/4

¶42

W.P(MD). No. 6039 of 2020

¶43

P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

¶44

pkn

¶45

W.P(MD). No. 6039 of 2020

¶46

15.12.2022

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

4/4

M.K.Palani Asari v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.K.Palani Asari v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalidoss Bharath Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Pradeepa.a Vs the District Collector Cum

M/s. Kumar Granites Vs The Director General of Foreign Trade

M.Sonaimuthu, Vs the Commissioner

K.Samayamuthu Vs the District Collector

Pandi Vs The Additional Superintendent of Police