Disposed

M/s. Kalpaka Chemicals Private Ltd., v. The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Madras HC6 Apr 2022WP(MD)/5986/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order disposed of a writ petition by directing the response respondent (CEO, GST Network) to consider the petitioner's representations and pass appropriate orders on merits within 8 weeks, ensuring the petitioner is heard before the final decision.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representations and pass appropriate orders on merits, on no costs.

M/s. Kalpaka Chemicals Private Ltd., Vs The Commissioner… — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.5986 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.04.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD) No.5986 of 2022

¶3

M/S.Kalpaka Chemicals Private Limited, 4/116, Caldwell Colony, 2^nd Street, Thoothukudi 628 008, represented by its Managing Director, Shri.S.Ganesan ... Petitioner /vs./

¶4

1.The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Madurai GST Commissionerate, Central Revenue Buildings, Bibikulam, Madurai.

¶5

2.The Chief Executive Officer, GST Network, 4^th Floor, Worldmark, 1, East Wing Asset, 11, Hospitality District, New Delhi 110 037.

¶6

3.The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, C-50, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Madathur Post, Tuticorin 628 008. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to objectively consider and dispose of the representations dated 10.12.2021 and 15.02.2022 of the petitioner in accordance with law and on merits.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Viswanathan For Respondents : Ms.S.Ragaventhre Junior Standing Counsel

¶9

ORDER

¶10

This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the representations dated 10.12.2021 and 15.02.2022 of the petitioner in accordance with law and on merits.

¶11

2.The learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the petitioner's representations dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

1/2

¶13

W.P.(MD) No.5986 of 2022

¶14

10.12.2021 and 15.02.2022 will be disposed of within 8 weeks by the 2^nd respondent.

¶15

3.Recording the above submission, the writ petition stands disposed of by directing the 2^nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 10.12.2021 and 15.02.2022 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to state that before passing such orders, the petitioner shall also be heard. No costs.

¶16

Assistant Registrar (Protocol)

¶17

// True Copy //

¶18

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶19

¶20

To:

¶21

1.The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Madurai GST Commissionerate, Central Revenue Buildings, Bibikulam, Madurai. 2.The Chief Executive Officer, GST Network, 4^th Floor, Worldmark, 1, East Wing Asset, 11, Hospitality District, New Delhi 110 037. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, C-50, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Madathur Post, Tuticorin 628 008. +1 CC to M/s.N. VISWANATHAN, Advocate ( SR-17258[F] dated 07/04/2022 )

¶22

W.P.(MD) No.5986 of 2022 06.04.2022

¶23

RD(21.04.2022) 2P 5C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

2/2

M/s. Kalpaka Chemicals Private Ltd., v. The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Kalpaka Chemicals Private Ltd., v. The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Lovely Offset Printers- Vs the Director (Dbk)

Geethakrishna Spinning Mills Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

M/S Shri Renuga Soft Vs the Assistant Commissioner

P. Mariam Beevi, Vs the Tamilnadu Wakf Board

S.P. Mariappan Vs the Commissioner

Peetee Coach Builders Private Limited Vs Union of India