Dismissed

Jude @ Judes Kumar, v. the Tribunal Under Maintenance

Madras HC14 Sept 2022WP(MD)/5002/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner was permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition challenging Tribunal proceedings regarding property and maintenance under the Act. Consequently, the petition and connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Jude @ Judes Kumar, Vs the Tribunal Under Maintenance — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.5002 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 14.09.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.5002 of 2013 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2013

Jude @ Judes Kumar

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Tribunal under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, Padmanabhapuram, Represented by its Presiding Officer-cum-the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanyakumari District-629 175.

¶11

2.J.James ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the first respondent , pertaining to its proceedings in O.P.No.7 of 2012 on its file, quash the same insofar as the same relate to the property in Re-Survey No.456/8 of Thirparappu Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District and the first respondent's consequential order dated 25.02.2013 in I/A. 1 of 2013/ O.P in 7/2013 on its file therein.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/3

¶15

W.P(MD)No.5002 of 2013

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.K.N.Thambi For R1 : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a Memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner is granted permission to withdraw the writ petition as per Memo.

¶19

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

¶20

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶21

14.09.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gbg To

¶22

The Presiding Officer-cum-the Revenue Divisional Officer, The Tribunal under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District-629 175.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/3

¶25

W.P(MD)No.5002 of 2013

¶26

R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.

¶27

gbg

¶28

Order made in W.P(MD)No.5002 of 2013

¶29

Dated: 14.09.2022

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

3/3

Jude @ Judes Kumar, v. the Tribunal Under Maintenance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jude @ Judes Kumar, v. the Tribunal Under Maintenance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N. Thangappan, Vs the District Collector

N.P.N.Elango, Vs the Dsitrict Collector

Mohamed Farook Vs the District Collector

S. Rajeshwari, Vs the Superintendenting Engineer

A. Thomas Durai @ Thomas Vs the Revenue Divisional

Hidayathulla, Vs the Assistant Engineer