Disposed

Jayaraman.S v. State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC11 Mar 2022WP(MD)/4339/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed the Additional Director General of Prison to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.02.2022 for granting ordinary leave to visit his brother, aged 43, who suffered accidental injuries, to be disposed of within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Second Respondent to consider the petitioner's representation for ordinary leave to visit the brother and pass orders within eight weeks.

Jayaraman.S Vs State of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.4339 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.03.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.4339 of 2022

S.Jayaraman

... Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Tamil Nadu,

¶11

Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Home (Prison-IV) Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George,

¶12

Chennai - 600 009.

¶13

The Additional Director General of Prison,

¶14

Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

¶15

The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore. ... Respondents

¶16

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to grant three days leave without escort to the petitioner's brother namely, Ganesan @ Kundu Ganesan (LCT No.228), aged 43 years, S/o.Sivanantham, who confined at Vellore Central Prison.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesan For Respondents : Mr.Antony S.Prabhakar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. AND

¶20

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶21

The petitioner seeks a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 14.02.2022, for grant of three days leave to visit his brother, who has suffered accidental injuries. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

1/2

¶23

W.P(MD)No.4339 of 2022

¶24

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶25

Considering the limited prayer sought for, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 14.02.2022, for grant of ordinary leave and pass orders, preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Assistant Registrar (P&A)

¶29

// True Copy //

¶30

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶31

¶32

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶33

¶34

The Secretary to Government, Home (Prison-IV) Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶35

The Additional Director General of Prison, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

¶36

The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore.

¶37

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶38

+1 CC to M/S.S.VENKATESAN, Advocate SR.12293(F), Dated 15.03.2022.

¶39

ORDER MADE IN

¶40

W.P(MD)No.4339 of 2022 11.03.2022

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ USK/22.03.2022/2P/6C

¶42

2/2

Jayaraman.S v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayaraman.S v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Shankar Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Sankar Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Mohan Vs The Superintendent of Police

S. Kaja Moideen Vs K. Raihana

Senthil Murugan Vs The Superintendent of Police

S.Sujitha Vs M.Natarajan