The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed W.P.(C)No.4300 of 2013, finding the prayer for certiorari was infructuous after the petitioner accepted the submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.4300 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :05.12.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.P.(MD)No.4300 of 2013 and
M.P.(MD).Nos.1 to 3 of 2013
K.Sreedharan Nair
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Joint Director of Cooperative Societies, Kanyakumari Region at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
... Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the Respondent in Na.Ka.No.4586/2004 S.P., dated 31.03.2010.
For Petitioner :Mr.S.B.Christopher For Respondent :Mr.SR.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader
_________ Page 1 of 3
W.P.(MD)No.4300 of 2013
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer that has been sought for has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
05.12.2022
Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order sbn
To The Joint Director of Cooperative Societies, Kanyakumari Region at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
_________ Page 2 of 3
W.P.(MD)No.4300 of 2013
K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
sbn
W.P.(MD)No.4300 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 to 3 of 2013
05.12.2022
_________ Page 3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Sreedharan Nair
The Joint Director of Cooperative Societies, Kanyakumari Region at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District
K.Kumaresh Babu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
