Dismissed

B.Lakshmi, v. the Alagappa University

Madras HC8 Nov 2022WP(MD)/342/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of promotion. Advising that a related batch disposed of in March 2022 already granted the required relief, the court directed the respondent to confer the upgradation from the initial date anticipated by the prior judgment and closed the connected miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Respondent to confer upgradation from the initial date; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

B.Lakshmi, Vs the Alagappa University — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

1 W.P.(MD)NO.342 OF 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 08.11.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.342 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.278 of 2019 & 1842 of 2022

¶7

B.Lakshmi, Deputy Registrar (U) (under reversion), Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District, Rep. by its Registrar. ... Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned resolution in Item No.2 (ii) passed by the respondent in the 172^nd meeting of its Syndicate held on 03.08.18 and its consequential impugned order in Rc.A6/Estt/Syn.Min/2018 dated 27.08.18 (served on 31.08.18) withdrawing the promotion without any notice and quash the same as illegal insofar as the petitioner is concerned.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew For Respondent : Ms.F.Rooshi Mass, for M/s.Isaac Chambers.

¶12

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

2 W.P.(MD)NO.342 OF 2019

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶18

2. The issue raised in this writ petition was dealt with by another learned Judge of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.19727 of 2018 etc. batch vide Order dated 09.03.2022. The prayer in the said writ petition also related to challenging the proceedings impugned in this present writ petition. After consideration of the materials on record, the writ petitions were disposed of with the following directions:-

¶19

“12. Therefore, this Court is of the

¶20

considered opinion that the respondents shall confer the upgradation to the petitioners from the initial date of upgradation granted under 171 st meeting of Syndicate. As far as the monetary benefits are concerned, the respondents can pay the benefits in installments, if there is any financial difficulties. The resolution of 172 nd meeting is set aside. ”

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

2/4

¶23

3 W.P.(MD)NO.342 OF 2019

¶24

3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that questioning the order dated 09.03.2022 in W.P. (MD)No.19727 of 2022 etc. batch, Alagappa University has preferred writ appeals and also they now pending at the SR stage. Further request is made for filing counter affidavit.

¶25

4. I make it clear that the present writ petition is being disposed of only in terms of the aforesaid order dated 09.03.2022. Therefore, the question of adjourning the matter does not arise. In this view of the matter, the respondent is directed to confer upgradation on the petitioner from the initial date of upgradation granted under 171 st meeting of Syndicate. The present writ petition is also disposed of on the same lines. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶26

08.11.2022

¶27

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No

¶28

PMU

¶29

To:

¶30

The Registrar, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/4

¶33

4 W.P.(MD)NO.342 OF 2019

¶34

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

¶35

PMU

¶36

W.P.(MD)No.342 of 2019

¶37

08.11.2022

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

4/4

B.Lakshmi, v. the Alagappa University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Lakshmi, v. the Alagappa University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Vijila, Vs the Secretary to the

Subramanian.a Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

A.Sivaniah Vs Arasu Rubber Corporation

P. Manoharan Vs State Bank of India

Shanthakumar.K.J. Vs The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest

Selvam .a Vs The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests