Disposed

Sivagami v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC22 Dec 2022WP(MD)/28866/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the petition for issuing a patta and sub-dividing land, allowing a fresh petition later. The court directed the survey authority to survey specific land, issue notices, hold an enquiry, and provide police protection, ensuring no dispossession occurs during the exercise.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to survey authority to conduct survey after notice and enquiry, implement safety measures, and submit report within six weeks.

Sivagami Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

1 W.P.(MD)NO.28866 OF 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.28866 of 2022

Sivagami

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.

¶11

The Tahsildar, Gujiliamparai Taluk Office, Gujiliamparai, Dindigul District.

¶12

The Head Surveyor, Gujiliamparai Taluk Office, Gujiliamparai, Dindigul District.

¶13

Mariyappan

¶14

Rajendran

¶15

Ramasamy ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents herein to measure and subdivide and issue the patta in favour of the petitioner with regard to property in Survey No.26/1 to an extent of 70 cents situated at

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/6

¶19

2 W.P.(MD)NO.28866 OF 2022

¶20

Tholipatti Village, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Dindigul District based on his representation dated 03.06.2022.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar

¶22

For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.M.Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader. * * *

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3.

¶25

Considering the nature of relief to be granted, issuance of notice to the private respondents is dispensed with.

¶26

The petitioner has applied to the jurisdictional authority for conducting survey of the petition mentioned lands and for demarcation of the boundaries. Since the authority had not acted upon the petitioner's request, this writ petition came to be filed.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/6

¶29

3 W.P.(MD)NO.28866 OF 2022

¶30

The petitioner is not pressing the prayer of sub-division and issuance of patta for the present.

¶31

Liberty is given to the petitioner to file a fresh writ

¶32

petition as regards sub-division and issuance of patta. The scope of the writ petition is confined only regarding survey of the petition mentioned property.

¶33

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶34

(I) The survey authority will issue notice to the writ petitioner as well as the adjacent land owners and also to the interested persons, if any.

¶35

(II) Enquiry shall be held. During enquiry, objections raised by the adjacent land owners / interested persons shall be considered.

¶36

(III) If according to the jurisdictional authority,

¶37

the objections are without any basis, the same shall be overruled and the objectors shall be informed accordingly. But the survey will be conducted only

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

3/6

¶40

4 W.P.(MD)NO.28866 OF 2022

¶41

after a period of six weeks so that the objector can move the concerned Court for injunction. If before the proposed date of survey, the objector is unable to obtain any injunction order, the survey can very well go on.

¶42

(IV) If the jurisdictional authority finds objections to be having substance, then, he shall call upon the applicant to move the jurisdictional civil Court for agitating his rights.

¶43

(V) If required, the survey authority is empowered to seek aid of the jurisdictional police and the jurisdictional police are mandated to grant police protection.

¶44

(VI) It is made clear that at the end of the survey exercise, survey stones alone can be installed. The exercise of survey and demarcation undertaken pursuant to the direction of this Court can never result in dispossession of any party. No person shall put up fencing at the time of survey by using police aid. The Survey Authority will pass order within a period of six weeks after service of notice on the interested persons.

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

4/6

¶47

5 W.P.(MD)NO.28866 OF 2022

¶48

(VII) A copy of the survey report will be served

on the parties also.

No costs.

22.12.2022

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No

¶53

PMU

¶54

To:

¶55

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.

¶56

The Tahsildar, Gujiliamparai Taluk Office, Gujiliamparai, Dindigul District.

¶57

The Head Surveyor, Gujiliamparai Taluk Office, Gujiliamparai, Dindigul District.

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

5/6

¶60

6 W.P.(MD)NO.28866 OF 2022

¶61

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

¶62

PMU

¶63

W.P.(MD)No.28866 of 2022

¶64

22.12.2022

¶65

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶66

6/6

Sivagami v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sivagami v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Rajeswari, W/O.Seethapathi Vs the District Collector

A.Umadevi Vs the Chairman

Muthulakshmi(Deceased), Vs the Commissioner

Sebastian Vs The Tahsildar

Karguvel. L Vs The District Collector

Muthukumar Vs The District Collector