Disposed

Muthu Raman .S.P v. the Commissioner

Madras HC10 Feb 2022WP(MD)/2764/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of this Writ Petition by directing the Assistant Commissioner to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation within ten days, ensuring interested persons are heard. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation within ten days after hearing interested persons.

Muthu Raman .S.P Vs the Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD).No.2764 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.02.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

W.P(MD).No.2764 of 2022

S.P.Muthu Raman

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uttamar Gandhi Street, Nungambakkam002C, Chennai-34.

¶11

2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chidamabara Nagar, Tuticorin- 628 008.

¶12

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Tenkasi-Courtralam Main Road, Courtralam, Tenkasi District. ...Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No. 1 to 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 13.05.2021 as expeditiously as possible within the time stipulation as prescribed by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Gunasekaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

¶15

ORDER

¶16

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner, dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 13.05.2021. It is needless to state that before passing such orders,

¶17

1/2

¶18

W.P(MD).No.2764 of 2022

¶19

the 3^rd respondent shall hear the interested persons, who are likely to be affected by the orders to be passed by the 3^rd respondent. The entire exercise shall be carried out by the third respondent within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs.

¶20

Assistant Registrar (P&A)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

¶23

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶24

¶25

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uttamar Gandhi Street, Nungambakkam002C, Chennai-34.

¶26

2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chidamabara Nagar, Tuticorin- 628 008.

¶27

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Tenkasi-Courtralam Main Road, Courtralam, Tenkasi District.

¶28

+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-5723[F] dated 11/02/2022 ) W.P(MD).No.2764 of 2022 10.02.2022 ARK(CO) GC(01.03.2022) 2P 5C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

Muthu Raman .S.P v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthu Raman .S.P v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanakumar K Vs the Secretary to the Government

Ramkumar G Vs the Secretary to the Government

Pathinettan S Vs the Managing Director

J.Rajesh Kumar Vs the Dist. Manager

Muruganandham .S Vs the Commissioner

Deepan .T Vs the Commissioner