Allowed

Rajangam C v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport

Madras HC27 Oct 2022WP(MD)/24455/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed by a retired driver of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation challenging the belated settlement of his terminal benefits. The High Court directed the corporation to pay interest at 6% per annum from the date of retirement until settlement.

What did the court decide?

Corporation directed to pay interest at 6% p.a. on belated benefits within twelve weeks of receipt of order.

Rajangam C Vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

1 W.P.(MD)NO.24455 OF 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 27.10.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.24455 of 2022

¶7

C.Rajangam ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Madurai.

¶10

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Virudhunagar Region, Virudhunagar.

¶11

The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai -2.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of petitioner's terminal benefits including Provident fund, Gratuity, Commuted Value of Pension and Terminal Leave salary from the date of his retirement till the date on which the said benefits were settled to him.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

2 W.P.(MD)NO.24455 OF 2022

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.S.Ramachandra Pradeep, Standing Counsel. For R-3 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Standing Counsel. * * *

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶20

The petitioner worked as Special Grade Driver in

¶21

the respondent Corporation. He retired on 31.03.2020. However, his terminal benefits were settled belatedly.

¶22

It is well settled that for such belated settlement, the retired employee is entitled to interest. I, therefore, direct the respondent Corporation to pay the interest to the writ petitioner computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated disbursement from the date of retirement till date of settlement. The interest amount shall be paid within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

3 W.P.(MD)NO.24455 OF 2022

¶26

4.This writ petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.

¶27

27.10.2022

¶28

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No

¶29

PMU

¶30

To:

¶31

The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai.

¶32

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Virudhunagar Region, Virudhunagar.

¶33

The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai -2.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

4 W.P.(MD)NO.24455 OF 2022

¶37

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

¶38

PMU

¶39

W.P.(MD)No.24455 of 2022

¶40

27.10.2022

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

4/4

Rajangam C v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajangam C v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Manikandan Vs the Director / Chairman of Selection Committee

R. Alaguraj, Vs Ashok Upreti (Ifs)

R.Rakku Vs J.Jayakanthan, IAS

K.Daniel Vs R.Sornakumar

Periyaswamy M Vs The State Express Transport

Nehru R Vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd.