Disposed

Murugesan.v v. The District Collector

Madras HC17 Oct 2022WP(MD)/23873/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a mandate to remove illegal construction on government land. Without adjudicating merits, the court directed authorities to consider the petitioner's representation and conduct a survey within eight weeks to remove the encroachment if substantiated.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, issue notice, conduct a survey, and take necessary action to remove encroachment within eight weeks.

Murugesan.v Vs The District Collector — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.23873 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 17.10.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶7

W.P(MD)No.23873 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD) No.17942 of 2022

V.Murugesan

... Petitioner

Vs.

The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶12

The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

¶13

The Block Development Officer, Virudhunagar Panchayat Union, Virudhunagar District.

¶14

The President, Kooraikundu Village Panchayat, Virudhunagar Panchayat Union, Virudhunagar Taluk and District.

¶15

J.Periyaraj

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

1/6

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.(MD)No.23873 of 2022

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to remove the encroachment made by the 5^th respondent in S.No. 213/4, Sevalpatti Village, Kooraikundu Village Panchayat, Virudhunagar Taluk and District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 28.09.2022.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.G.R.Satish For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader for R1 to R3

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J. )

¶24

The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to remove the encroachment made by the fifth respondent in Survey No.213/4, at Sevalpatti Village, Kooraikundu Village Panchayat, Virudhunagar Taluk and District, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 28.09.2022.

¶25

Heard Mr.G.R.Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶26

Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Government Pleader, who accepts notice for the respondents 1 to 3. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶27

2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.23873 of 2022

¶29

Having regard to the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 4 and 5 is dispensed with.

¶30

Pointing out that the fifth respondent has encroached upon the Government poramboke land by putting up illegal construction in Survey No. 213/4, at Sevalpatti Village, Kooraikundu Village Panchayat, Virudhunagar District, which is said to be a vacant land used for the purpose of conducting meetings by the villagers, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 28.09.2022, to the respondents 1 to 3, which according to the learned counsel for the petitioner is unattended. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.09.2022, in accordance with law.

¶31

Considering the limited scope of the prayer now sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of claim made by the petitioner either in the representation or in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated

¶32

3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD)No.23873 of 2022

¶34

28.09.2022 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. If there is any encroachment as claimed by the petitioner, after issuing notice and conducting survey in the presence of the petitioner, fifth respondent and any others concerned, necessary action has to be taken by the authorities for removal of encroachment in the said vacant land, by following due process of law. Such an exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶35

[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 17.10.2022

¶36

Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No pkn

¶37

4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.(MD)No.23873 of 2022

¶39

¶40

The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶41

The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

¶42

The Block Development Officer, Virudhunagar Panchayat Union, Virudhunagar District.

¶43

The President, Kooraikundu Village Panchayat, Virudhunagar Panchayat Union, Virudhunagar Taluk and District.

¶44

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.(MD)No.23873 of 2022

¶46

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶47

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

¶48

pkn

¶49

W.P(MD)No.23873 of 2022

¶50

17.10.2022

¶51

6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Murugesan.v v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugesan.v v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandiramohan .I Vs The District Collector

Sujithra, Vs the Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Sasikumar Vs The District Collector

K.R.Sakthivel Raja Vs P.S.Balasubramanian

Matthew.J Vs The District Collector

Suresh Vs The District Collector