This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.2245 of 2011 and
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)No.2245 of 2011 and
MP(MD) No.1 of 2011
K.Sappani ...Petitioner
Vs.
2.K.Balasubramanian 3.K.Ganesan
4.K.Krishnan
...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned communication dated 15.02.2011, bearing e.f.vz; ckpngh/g/ jp.Nrj;jp/Nfh.jpd/m.vz; /11 issued by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently forbearing the first respondent from effecting disconnection of electricity service connection S.C.No.1882 under Tariff V Category in SF No.86/8 Near Amman Koil, Thiruppachethy North Village, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For R1 : Mr.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel For R2 to R4 : Mr.S.Rajasekar
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed as against the notice issued by the respondent Board in e.f.vz; ckpngh/g/ jp.Nrj;jp/Nfh.jpd/m.vz; /11, dated 15.02.2011, for disconnecting electricity service connection, based on the objections raised by the respondents 2 to 4.
1/2
W.P(MD)No.2245 of 2011 and
2.The petitioner and the respondents 2 to 4 are brothers. The petitioner is running a School, for which he also obtained electricity service connection from Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. The respondents 2 to 4 claiming right over the property and objected for the electricity connection given to the petitioner stating that the electricity service connection was granted in favour of the petitioner alone in the individual name and based on the objections of the respondents 2 to 4, the Board has also issued the impugned notice. Pending the writ petition, it appears that the respondents 2 to 4 have also filed a suit for partition before the District Munsif Court, Manamadurai in O.S.No.142 of 2011 and the same was dismissed, vide judgment and decree dated 07.04.2017.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that the respondents 2 to 4 have also filed an appeal before the Subordinate Court, Sivagangai in AS No.97 of 2017.
4.In view of the subsequent developments that the suit preferred by the respondents 2 to 4 in O.S.No.142 of 2011 was dismissed on 07.04.2017 by the Civil Court, this writ petition is disposed of. The parties are at liberty to work out their remedy depending upon the outcome of the civil litigation. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
// True Copy //
/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
vrn
To
The Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and
Distribution Corporation Ltd,
Thiruppachethy, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District.
+1 CC to M/s.T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate SR-16634[F] +1 CC to M/s.S.DEENADHAYALAN, Advocate SR-16657[F]
ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.2245 of 2011 and MP(MD) No.1 of 2011 01.04.2022
USK/26.05.2022/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2/2
K.Sappani
Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd
K.Balasubramanian
K.Ganesan
K.Krishnan
B.Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
