Allowed

Velmurugan D.S v. the District Collector (Cum)

Madras HC15 Feb 2022WP(MD)/2161/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment allows the petitioner's writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The High Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.01.2022 and pass appropriate orders on merits within four weeks. No costs. The petition relates to proceedings involving a third party representation before the Regional Transport Authority.

What did the court decide?

Wording by respondents to take appropriate actions on petitioner's representation dated 22.01.2022 within four weeks.

Velmurugan D.S Vs the District Collector (Cum) — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Writ Petition (MD) No.2161 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.02.2022 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶4

Writ Petition (MD) No.2161 of 2022

¶5

D.S.Velmurugan, Proprietor, Sri Senthilmurugan Transport, 2, West Ponnagaram 7^th Street, Madurai - 625 016. .. Petitioner Versus 1.The District Collector cum the Regional Transport Authority, Collector Office, Madurai.

¶6

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Madurai South, Regional Transport Office, Madurai.

¶7

3.The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Unit Office, Vadipatti, Madurai.

¶8

4.The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Unit Office, Batlagundu, Madurai. .. Respondents

¶9

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.11.2021 and 22.01.2022 to take appropriate action under Section 86(1)(b) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugapoopathy For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader

¶11

ORDER

¶12

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents for some time and after considering the representation, dated 10.02.2022 of one Jakkammal, a copy of which has been circulated by the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

1/2

¶14

Writ Petition (MD) No.2161 of 2022

¶15

Additional Government Pleader for the respondents and the notice issued by the respondents to the petitioner on 07.02.2022 and the order dated 05.02.2022, imposing a fine of Rs.9,000/- on the said Jakkammal, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law on the representation dated 22.01.2022, of the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt a copy of this order. No costs.

¶16

Assistant Registrar (DR-A/C)

¶17

// True Copy //

¶18

smn2

¶19

To 1.The District Collector cum the Regional Transport Authority, Collector Office, Madurai. 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Madurai South, Regional Transport Office, Madurai. 3.The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Unit Office, Vadipatti, Madurai. 4.The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Unit Office, Batlagundu, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.R.MURUGA BOOPATHY, Advocate ( SR-6874[F] dated 17/02/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-6461[F] dated 16/02/2022 ) WP (MD) No.2161 of 2022 15.02.2022 RK(03/03/2022) 2P 7C

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

2/2

Velmurugan D.S v. the District Collector (Cum)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Velmurugan D.S v. the District Collector (Cum)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Iyem Perumal.S Vs the Commissioner

Govindaraj Chettiyar I Vs the Commissioner

Rathinam.R Vs the Joint Commissioner

Prithivirajan.M.P Vs the Commissioner of Transport

M/s.Rudveda Syndicates Vs The Commissioner of Customs

Jakkammal .M Vs the Regional Transport Authority