Dismissed

K.Murugesan, v. the Tirunelveli District Co-Op

Madras HC3 Jan 2022WP(MD)/2073/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging appointments of milk producers union employees. The petition was withdrawn as the appellant furnished a delayed certificate, though the petitioner was granted liberty for future vacancies.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to make representation for the post of Extension Officer Grade II as and when a vacancy arises. No costs awarded.

K.Murugesan, Vs the Tirunelveli District Co-Op — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.2073 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.01.2022 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.(MD)No.2073 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.2325 & 2326 of 2018

1.K.Murugesan

2.P.Semaraj

...Petitioners

/Vs./

1.The Tirunelveli District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Limited,

¶9

Represented by its General Manager, Reddiyarpatti Road, Perumalpuram Post, Tirunelveli District – 627 007.

¶10

2.The Assessment Committee,

¶11

Represented by its Assistant General Manager, Reddiyarpatti Road, Perumalpuram Post, Tirunelveli District – 627 007.

¶12

3.A.Selwyn

¶13

4.M.Velayutham

¶14

5.A.Jeyapaul Packiaraj

¶15

6.V.Pauldurai

¶16

7.P.Ponvixon

¶17

8.S.Gowathy

¶18

9.G.Govindaraj

¶19

10.S.Sudalaimuthu

¶20

The respondents 3 to 10 are working at the Tirunelveli District Co-operative

¶21

Milk Producers Union Limited,

¶22

Reddiyarpatti Road, Perumalpuram Post, Tirunelveli District – 627 007.

¶23

...Respondents

¶24

PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the files of the 2^nd respondent pertaining to its report dated 06-10-2017 and the consequential order of appointment issued by the 1^st respondent bearing Ref. No.0083/Admn-1/2014 dated 06-10-2017 appointing the respondents 3 to 10 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to make appointment in a transparent manner in accordance with rules within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

1/2

¶27

W.P.(MD)No.2073 of 2018

¶28

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For R1 & R2 : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar For R3 to R10 : Mr.Karthik for M/s.T.Lajapathi Roy

¶29

ORDER

¶30

Heard Mr.S.C.Herold Singh for the petitioner, Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, learned counsel for the R1 & R2 and Mr.Karthik, learned counsel for the private respondents.

¶31

2.After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not pursue this writ petition, as the certificate from the Tirunelveli District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Limited has been furnished to the respondent employer, admittedly a day late. An e-mail to aforesaid effect has also been received from learned counsel for the petitioner. This Writ Petition is thus dismissed as withdrawn.

¶32

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to make suitable representation to the respondents for the post of Extension Officer Grade II, as and when there is a vacancy available for the said post. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶33

// True Copy //

¶34

¶35

Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶36

+1 CC to M/s.T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate (SR-285[F] dated 05/01/2022 )

¶37

+1 CC to M/s.S.C.HEROLD SINGH, Advocate (SR-74[F] dated 04/01/2022 ) Order made in W.P.(MD)No.2073 of 2018 Dated: 03.01.2022

¶38

SE(CO)

¶39

GC(20.01.2022) 2P 3C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

2/2

K.Murugesan, v. the Tirunelveli District Co-Op

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Murugesan, v. the Tirunelveli District Co-Op

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Muruganantham Vs The Secretary

M.Muthukrishnan Vs the Regional Transport Officer

Arasu Pokkuvarathukazhaga Vs The Secretary to Government

M.Kannan Vs Ponmudi

G.Mari Vs Ponmudi

Bemila Getsiyal Ebenezer Vs the Secretary