Dismissed

Ismail, S/O Asan Kani, v. Tamil Nadu Generation and

Madras HC10 Jun 2022WP(MD)/20244/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an illegal seniority list as infructuous because the petitioner's name was subsequently included in the revised list during the pendency of the petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Ismail, S/O Asan Kani, Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.20244 of 2014

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.06.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶5

W.P.(MD).No.20244 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 and 2 of 2014

Ismail

... Petitioner

vs.

1.Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution

¶10

Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO),

¶11

144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002

¶12

represented by its Chairman.

¶13

2.The Chief Engineer / Personnel, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO),

¶14

144, Anna Salai,

¶15

Chennai 600 002.

¶16

3.The committee (Under B.P.No.38) (TANGEDCO),

¶17

144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 represented by its Chairman (Director / Distribution). ... Respondents

¶18

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent in Letter No.102677/825/ep.fp/G.4/f/2013-12, dated 26.11.2014 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to take final decision on the basis of the report of the third respondent committee constituted vide (Per) CMD TANGEDCO Proceedings No.38, dated 01.04.2014 within the period that may be fixed by this Court.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Deepak Arasu for Mr.H.Arumugam

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.G.Kasinatha Durai

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

This Writ Petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent in Letter No.102677/825/ep.fp/G.4/f/2013-12, dated 26.11.2014 and quash the same https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

1/2

¶24

W.P.(MD).No.20244 of 2014

¶25

and consequently direct the first respondent to take a final decision, on the basis of the report of the third respondent Committee constituted vide (Per) CMD TANGEDCO Proceedings No.38, dated 01.04.2014.

¶26

Mr.D.Deepak Arasu, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr.H.Arumugam, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the seniority list prepared by the respondents is illegal, irrelevance, unreasonable, arbitrary and therefore, this writ petition is filed. He further submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the seniority list had been revised and the name of the petitioner is included in the seniority list. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he prays for dismissal of this writ petition.

¶27

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶28

Assistant Registrar (CS III)

¶29

// True Copy //

¶30

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶31

¶32

1.Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 represented by its Chairman.

¶33

2.The Chief Engineer / Personnel,

¶34

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO),

¶35

144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶36

3.The committee (Under B.P.No.38)

¶37

(TANGEDCO),

¶38

144, Anna Salai,

¶39

Chennai 600 002 represented by its Chairman (Director / Distribution).

¶40

+1 CC to M/s.H.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-25329[F] dated 13/06/2022 ) W.P.(MD).No.20244 of 2014 10.06.2022

¶41

SS(17/06/2022) 2P 5C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

2/2

Ismail, S/O Asan Kani, v. Tamil Nadu Generation and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ismail, S/O Asan Kani, v. Tamil Nadu Generation and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Ramesh Vs the Secretary to Government

P. Ramachandran, Vs the Managing Director

K.Meganathan, Vs the Managing Director

Thenmandala Kootturavu Vs the Presiding Officer

Irulappan.M Vs The General Manager

Umavathy.R Vs The Chief Educational Officer