Disposed

Anandhan.K.S v. the Managing Director

Madras HC10 Jun 2022WP(MD)/1874/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the District Collector to consider the petitioner's representation for a housing allotment under applicable schemes and dispose of it within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

Anandhan.K.S Vs the Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.1874 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.06.2022 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶4

W.P(MD)No.1874 of 2022

¶5

K.S.Anandhan ... Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Triplicane, Chennai – 600 005.

¶8

2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶9

3.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Madurai Division, 169, K.K.Nagar Main Road, Madurai 625 020. ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2^nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2021 seeking allotment of free or monthly installment house which was constructed by the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board at Athikulam, Madurai District.

¶11

For Petitioner : Ms.S.K.B.V.Srimathi For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash, Addl. Government Pleader for R2 No appearance for R1 & R3

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the second respondent.

¶14

2.The petitioner claims that he is living below the poverty line and that he is entitled to be a beneficiary under schemes floated by the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board. He has given a representation dated 27.12.2021 seeking the relief. Since it has not been considered, the present writ petition came to be filed.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

W.P(MD)No.1874 of 2022

¶18

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention to the order dated 22.09.2021 made in W.P.(MD)No.16979 of 2021. A learned Judge of this Court has passed the following order:-

¶19

“4. The petitioner has enclosed her Aadhaar and Pan Card as also the representation submitted to the District Collector. The State has floated several schemes for the provision of housing to the poor and homeless. In fact, provision has been made in such regard even under the Pradhan Manthiri Awas Yojana Gramin Scheme. Therefore, it is just and necessary that the petitioner's representation be considered in accordance with one of the applicable schemes and disposed of within a reasonable time.

¶20

5. Accordingly, without going into the merits of the matter, the second respondent herein is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.07.2021 by taking into account all applicable schemes in such regard and dispose of such representation within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

¶21

4.I am of the view that similar direction can be given in the present writ petition also. The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

5.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar (CO)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

/07/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

Ias

¶27

To:

¶28

The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶29

+1 CC to M/s.R.KANNAN, Advocate ( SR-25238[F] dated 13/06/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-25423[F] dated 13/06/2022 )

¶30

W.P(MD)No.1874 of 2022 10.06.2022

¶31

RD(04.07.2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

Anandhan.K.S v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anandhan.K.S v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Centre for the Educare and Research Charitable Trust Vs the Principal Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu

Kesavan.a Vs the Executive Engineer

Edwin.K Vs The Branch Manager

Keerthika T.B Vs the Managing Director

Karthikeyan T Vs The District Collector

Vinoth R Vs The Regional Manager