Ramalingam v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a revenue officer's order recording another person's name in land records, noting the matter was already resolved via a set-aside order filed by the respondent authorities.
What did the court decide?
No order as to costs; connected petitions closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD).No.17539 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.12.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.P(MD)No.17539 of 2013 and
M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2013
Ramalingam
... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District.
- The Sub-Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.
- The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramalingam
- respondent
The District Collector, Tirunelveli District
- respondent
The Sub-Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District
- respondent
The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court