Disposed

The Evergreen Recreation Club v. the Inspector General of Police

Madras HC23 Mar 2022WP(MD)/16914/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner club sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 to restrain police respondents from entering the premises without due process. The respondent government counsel submitted that no interference occurred. The court recorded this submission and closed the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed with no costs.

The Evergreen Recreation Club Vs the Inspector General… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.16914 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.03.2022 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P(MD)No.16914 of 2021

¶4

The Evergreen Recreation Club,

¶5

Represented by its Secretary, K.Muthukrishnan.

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The Inspector General of Police,

¶9

The Office of the Inspector General of Police, Tiruchirappalli-Pudukkottai Road, T.V.S Tolgate,

¶10

Tiruchirappalli District -620 020.

¶11

2.The Superintendent of Police,

¶12

The Office of the Superintendent of Police,

¶13

Pudukkkottai District – 622 005.

¶14

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

¶15

The Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police,

¶16

Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai District – 622 407.

¶17

4.The Inspector of Police,

¶18

K.Pudupatti Police Station, Kulipirai Post, Thirumaiyam Taluk, Pudukkottai District – 622 402.

¶19

... Respondents

¶20

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 3 and 4 their subordinate police officials from enter into the club frequently or interfering or disturbing in the peaceful and smooth daily routine functioning of the Evergreen Recreation Club, located at Chettiar Oorani Street, Perumal Kovil Back side, Arimalam Post, Thirumaiyam Taluk, Pudukkottai District 622 201 vide Registration No.196/1994 registered under Societies Registration Act (27 of 1975) at the guise of enquiry search or investigation or at the guise of seizure of property without following due process of law and without adopting the procedure established under law by considering representation of petitioner dated 28.08.2021 and his prior representation, dated 12.04.2021.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar

¶22

For Respondents : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

1/3

¶25

W.P(MD)No.16914 of 2021

¶26

ORDER

¶27

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 3 and 4, their subordinate police officials from entering into the club frequently or interfering or disturbing in the peaceful and smooth daily routine functioning of the Evergreen Recreation Club, by considering the representation of petitioner dated 28.08.2021 and his prior representation, dated 12.04.2021.

¶28

2.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that the respondent police neither interfered nor disturbed the peaceful and smooth daily routine functioning of the Evergreen Recreation Club and the respondent police advised them to fix CC TV camera.

¶29

3.Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

¶30

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶31

¶32

Note :

¶33

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶34

¶35

1.The Inspector General of Police, The Office of the Inspector General of Police, Tiruchirappalli-Pudukkottai Road, T.V.S Tolgate,

¶36

Tiruchirappalli District -620 020.

¶37

2.The Superintendent of Police,

¶38

The Office of the Superintendent of Police, Pudukkkottai District – 622 005.

¶39

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

¶40

The Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai District – 622 407.

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶42

2/3

¶43

W.P(MD)No.16914 of 2021

¶44

4.The Inspector of Police, K.Pudupatti Police Station, Kulipirai Post, Thirumaiyam Taluk, Pudukkottai District – 622 402.

¶45

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶46

+1 CC to M/s.R.SURESHKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-14166[F] dated 24/03/2022 )

¶47

W.P(MD)No.16914 of 2021 23.03.2022

¶48

RK(04/04/2022) 3P 7C

¶49

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶50

3/3

The Evergreen Recreation Club v. the Inspector General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Evergreen Recreation Club v. the Inspector General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muni @ Ramasamy Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

K.Pandiaraj Vs The Inspector of Police

Ochappan.C Vs The Deputy Superintendent of POlice

T.Kumaresan Vs Banu Santhini @ Pandeeswari

R.Elavarasan Vs G.Senthil Kumar

N.Ellammal Vs P.Sivasubramanian