Dismissed

Thathasamy.P v. the Deputy Inspector General (Registration)

Madras HC16 Dec 2022WP(MD)/1675/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a mandate to declare and convene an election for the management of a society, the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the permission to withdraw, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Thathasamy.P Vs the Deputy Inspector General… — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.1675 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 16.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.1675 of 2021

P.Thathasamy

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Deputy Inspector General (Registration), Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

¶11

2.The District Registrar (Admin/Additional Charge), (Assistant Inspector of General Grade (Registration), Department of Registration, Polpettai, Tuticorin – 628 002.

¶12

3.The Tuticorin Lorry Owners Association, (Reg. No.43/1972), 114/B, Polpettai, Tuticorin – 628 002. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing to declare and convene Election to the Management of 3rd respondent Society, with full-fledged members list/voters list based on petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2020 according to law.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

W.P(MD)No.1675 of 2021

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sasi Kumar

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheeskumar, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2. Mr.N.Anandakumar for R3.

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and also circulated letter to the Registry to that effect.

¶21

2.Permission granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No

¶22

costs.

¶23

16.12.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶24

To:

¶25

1.The Deputy Inspector General (Registration), Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

¶26

2.The District Registrar (Admin/Additional Charge), (Assistant Inspector of General Grade (Registration), Department of Registration, Polpettai, Tuticorin – 628 002.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/4

¶29

W.P(MD)No.1675 of 2021

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶31

W.P(MD)No.1675 of 2021

¶32

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶33

ias

¶34

W.P(MD)No.1675 of 2021

¶35

16.12.2022

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Thathasamy.P v. the Deputy Inspector General (Registration)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thathasamy.P v. the Deputy Inspector General (Registration)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Thiruneelapandian Vs the Registrar

R.v.Thevar Memorial Girls Vs the Director

R.Vignesh Chander, Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

S.Senthilkumar, Vs the Director of Fishery Dept.

M.Kumar Vs the Prl.Secretary to Govt.

R.Rajendran Vs the District Collecotr