Disposed

M.P. Rammohan Raja v. State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC8 Sept 2022WP(MD)/16502/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In these writ petitions, the petitioner, who was dead at the time of hearing, sought to quash orders preventing material transport from specific lands in Virudhunagar District. The court closed the petitions due to the petitioner's death, ordering no costs.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petitions and connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed as the petitioner is deceased.

M.P. Rammohan Raja Vs State of Tamil Nadu — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)Nos.16502 & 16503 of 2014

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.09.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶7

W.P(MD)Nos.16502 & 16503 of 2014 and

¶8

M.P(MD)Nos.2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5 & 5 of 2014 & 1 & 1 of 2015

¶9

M.P.Rammohan Raja ... Petitioner in both W.Ps'

¶10

vs.

¶11

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Principal Secretary to Government, Industries Department,

¶12

Fort St. George,

¶13

Chennai – 600 009.

¶14

2.The Director of Geology and Mining, Chennai – 600 035.

¶15

3.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.

¶16

4.Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the third respondent made in KV1/1443/2003, dated 25.04.2014

¶18

1/5

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P(MD)Nos.16502 & 16503 of 2014

¶21

and 30.04.2014 and consequential order dated 30.06.2014 and consequential final order in KV1/1443/2003 dated 07.07.2014 quash the same and consequently direct the third and fourth respondents to permit the petitioner to transport the quarried materials from the lands in Survey No.1270 of an extent of 29.59.0 hectares in Venkateswarapuram Village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District and in Survey No.854 of an extent of 8.80 acres in Pillayarkulam Village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeganathan (In both W.Ps') For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar (In both W.Ps') Government Pleader

¶23

COMMON ORDER

¶24

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)

¶25

The prayer made in these Writ Petitions is to quash the order of the third respondent made in KV1/1443/2003, dated 25.04.2014 and 30.04.2014 and consequential order dated 30.06.2014 and consequential final order in KV1/1443/2003 dated 07.07.2014 and consequently directing the third and fourth respondents to permit the petitioner to transport the quarried materials from the lands in Survey No.1270 of an extent of

¶26

2/5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P(MD)Nos.16502 & 16503 of 2014

¶29

29.59.0 hectares in Venkateswarapuram Village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District and in Survey No.854 of an extent of 8.80 acres in Pillayarkulam Village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

¶30

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is no more.

¶31

Recording the said submission, these Writ Petitions stand closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶32

[R.M.D.,J.] [J.S.N.P.,J.] 08.09.2022

¶33

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps

¶34

Note :

¶35

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶36

3/5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P(MD)Nos.16502 & 16503 of 2014

¶39

¶40

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Represented by the Principal Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶41

2.The Director of Geology and Mining, Chennai – 600 035.

¶42

3.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.

¶43

4.Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Virudhunagar District.

¶44

4/5

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P(MD)Nos.16502 & 16503 of 2014

¶47

R.MAHADEVAN,J.

¶48

and

¶49

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

¶50

¶51

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)Nos.16502 & 16503 of 2014

¶52

08.09.2022

¶53

5/5

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.P. Rammohan Raja v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.P. Rammohan Raja v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meenakshi Sundari.S.a Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

V.Pethimaharajan, Vs the Principal Secretary

P.Chidambaram, S/O.Periyasamy Vs the Director of Fisheries

I. Robert Chandra Kumar Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Christoper Selvaraj Vs The District Collector

Murugesan. S Vs The District Collector