Disposed

K.Velusamy, v. the District Collector

Madras HC22 Nov 2022WP(MD)/15188/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by K. Velusamy seeking removal of encroachment on a public cart road. The Court directed the third respondent (Tahsildar) to consider the petitioner's representation, while instructing all authorities to remove any encroachment within twelve weeks after conducting a survey and following due process of law.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.05.2019 and pass appropriate orders; authorities to remove encroachment within twelve weeks after survey and hear

K.Velusamy, Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.15188 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.11.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶6

W.P(MD)No.15188 of 2019

K.Velusamy

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, Dindigul District.

¶11

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani,

¶12

Dindigul District.

¶13

3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶14

4.J.Vijayabharathi

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

(R4 impleaded vide order of this Court made in W.M.P.(MD) No.16122 of 2019 in W.P.(MD) No.15188 of 2019 on 22.11.2022 by RMDJ & JSNPJ)

¶17

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to remove the encroachment made in public cart road in Survey No.

¶18

1/5

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD)No.15188 of 2019

¶21

335/2 which is situated at Poosaripatti village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 27/05/2019.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah

¶23

For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader For 4^th Respondent : Mr.M.P.Senthil * * *

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J. )

¶26

The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made in the public cart road in Survey No.335/2, situated at Poosaripatti village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District, by considering his representation dated 27.05.2019.

¶27

Heard Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.M.P.Senthil, learned counsel for the 4^th respondent.

¶28

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.(MD)No.15188 of 2019

¶30

Alleging that the 4^th respondent has made

¶31

encroachment in the public cart road in Survey No.335/2, situated at Poosaripatti village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District, and thereby preventing the public from using the public cart road, the petitioner submitted various representations to the official respondents and finally on 27.05.2019, and the same, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, remains as such. Hence, the Writ Petition.

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that though the petitioner has sought for a larger relief, he would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to the third respondent to dispose of his representation dated 27.05.2019, within a time frame.

¶33

Considering the limited scope of the prayer now sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, either in the representation or in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated

¶34

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.(MD)No.15188 of 2019

¶36

27.05.2019, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. If there is any encroachment as claimed by the petitioner, after issuing notice and conducting survey in the presence of the petitioner, the 4^th respondent and any other parties, the authorities concerned shall take necessary action for removal of the encroachment, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties and by following due process of law. Such an exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶37

[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 22.11.2022

¶38

Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sj

¶39

¶40

1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, Dindigul District.

¶41

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.

¶42

3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶43

4/5

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.(MD)No.15188 of 2019

¶46

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

¶47

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶48

¶49

W.P(MD)No.15188 of 2019

¶50

22.11.2022

¶51

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.Velusamy, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Velusamy, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Packiyam, S/O. Ramaiah Nadar Vs the Inspector General of

Seeni.P Vs The District Collector

Thiyagarajan.v Vs The District Collector

Rajam.K Vs the Dist. Collector

Angusamy Vs the District Collector

M.Shajahan Vs the Commissioner