Disposed

Vadivel v. the District Collector

Madras HC27 Oct 2022WP(MD)/14670/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed writ petition for removal of encroachments on specific land. Authorities inspected the site and promised removal. Court disposed petition directing respondents to remove encroachments within eight weeks after affording opportunities to all concerned parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to remove encroachments within eight weeks after affording sufficient opportunity to petitioner and other concerned parties.

Vadivel Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.14670 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 27.10.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶6

W.P(MD)No.14670 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD) No.11601 of 2021

Vadivel

... Petitioner

Vs.

The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

¶11

The Tahsildar, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.

¶12

The Divisional Engineer, State Highways Department, Construction Maintenance, Karur.

¶13

K.Balasubramani

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made in Survey Nos.218 and 219 at Trichy – Thogamalai Road, Keelaveliyur, Kalladai Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District, in terms of the proceedings of the third respondent made in Na.Ka.No.655/2021/A2 dated 30.06.2021.

¶16

1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD)No.14670 of 2021

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govindarajan For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Addl. Government Pleader For Respondent No.4 : Mr.P.Parthiban

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J. )

¶21

The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made in Survey Nos.218 and 219 at Trichy – Thogamalai Road, Keelaveliyur, Kalladai Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District, in terms of the proceedings of the third respondent made in Na.Ka.No.655/2021/A2 dated 30.06.2021.

¶22

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, produced a status report of the second respondent – Tahsildar, Kulithalai Taluk, addressed to him along with the counter-affidavit of the third respondent and submitted that pursuant to the filing of this Writ Petition, the authorities

¶23

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.14670 of 2021

¶25

concerned have inspected the aforesaid land in question, wherein, it is affirmed that there are 51 persons encroached the said land and he further submitted that

¶26

the encroachments will be removed within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶27

The aforesaid submission of the learned Additional Government

¶28

Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 is not refuted by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶29

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to proceed with removal of encroachment in question, after affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, fourth respondent and all other parties concerned and by following due process of law. Such an exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶30

[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 27.10.2022

¶31

Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No pkn

¶32

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD)No.14670 of 2021

¶34

¶35

The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

¶36

The Tahsildar, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.

¶37

The Divisional Engineer, State Highways Department, Construction Maintenance, Karur.

¶38

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.(MD)No.14670 of 2021

¶40

and

¶41

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

¶42

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶43

pkn

¶44

W.P(MD)No.14670 of 2021

¶45

27.10.2022

¶46

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Vadivel v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vadivel v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arivalagan.P.K Vs The District Collector

S.Jayaprakash Vs the Secretary to Govt.

Thilipkumar. K Vs The District Collector

Muniyasamy.M Vs the Dist.Collector

Govindaraj.a.S Vs the District Collector

Antony Siluvai Muthu Vs the District Collector