Disposed

Arun.K v. The Managing Director

Madras HC18 Jul 2022WP(MD)/14338/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a transfer order by granting the petitioner liberty to submit a fresh representation seeking transfer to any other place, directing the respondent to consider it within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh representation seeking transfer to any other place; direction to respondent to consider and pass an order within two weeks.

Arun.K Vs The Managing Director — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.14338 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 18.07.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.14338 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD).No.10243 of 2022

K.Arun

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Handicrafts Development Corporation Limited, No.759, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ...Respondent

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent dated 05.05.2022 in R.C.No.TNHDC/69/Per/2022 and quash the same as illegal.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Rajaraman For Respondent : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader assisted by Mr.Ramesh, Government Advocate.

¶13

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.(MD).No.14338 of 2022

¶15

ORDER

¶16

By consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶17

Though the petitioner herein has sought for a larger relief to quash the order of transfer, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a direction is given to the respondent to consider his representation, dated 07.05.2022, wherein, he has sought for revocation of transfer order and for re-posting him in the same place.

¶18

In the aforesaid representation, the petitioner had sought for retaining him in the same place from where he was transferred. Since few months have lapsed from the date of the transfer, it will not be appropriate for the respondent to consider such a request. However, if the petitioner is granted liberty to give a fresh representation seeking for transfer in any other place, with a consequential direction to the respondent to consider the same within a stipulated time, the ends of justice could be secured.

¶19

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD).No.14338 of 2022

¶21

In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the petitioner to give a fresh representation to the respondent, seeking for transfer to any other place. On receipt of such a representation, the respondent herein is directed to consider the same, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a fresh representation.

¶22

5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

¶23

18.07.2022

¶24

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Lm/TM

¶25

¶26

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Handicrafts Development Corporation Limited, No.759, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶27

3/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.(MD).No.14338 of 2022

¶30

M.S.RAMESH, J.

¶31

Lm/TM

¶32

W.P.(MD).No.14338 of 2022

¶33

18.07.2022

¶34

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Arun.K v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun.K v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Gladious Vs the Chief Educational Officer

R.Jasmine Alex Geetha Vs the District Educational

M.Gurusamy, Vs Additional Chief Secretary

Lm.Salim Vs Principal Chief Security Commissioner

Balaji Vs The Regional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Vijay Ananth.D Vs The Inspector General of Registration