C.Bose, v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
writ petitions seeking quashing of administrative orders were dismissed as infructuous because the relief sought had become barred. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous and no costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
WP (MD) Nos.13812 of 2019 & 24813 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.02.2022 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Writ Petition (MD) Nos.13812 of 2019 & 24813 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)No.22496 of 2018 in W.P.(MD)No.24813 of 2018
W.P.(MD)No.13812 of 2019:-
C.Bose .. Petitioner Versus
1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Admn. Department, Chennai - 600 034.
2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Admn. Department, Madurai.
3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Admn. Department, Madurai.
4.The Executive Officer / Joint Commissioner, A/M. Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple, Madurai.
.. Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Bose
- respondent
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner, A/M. Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple, Madurai
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments
- respondent
The Executive Officer / Joint Commissioner, A/M. Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple, Madurai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court