Dismissed

V. Rajendiran, v. the District Revenue

Madras HC13 Dec 2022WP(MD)/13571/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment, a non-speaking order dated 13.12.2022 of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, concerns a writ petition challenging revenue orders regarding land subdivision and patta issuance. The petitioner withdrew the writ petition during hearing, resulting in the dismissal of the matter.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Connected petitions closed.

V. Rajendiran, Vs the District Revenue — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.13571 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED :13.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.13571 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 & 1 of 2014

¶7

V.Rajendiran ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶10

2.The Tahsildhar, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶11

3.Tmt.Santhana Marry. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for entire records relating to the impugned order of the 1^st respondent in Na.Ka.B1/22667/2013, dated 06.08.2013 confirming the order of the 2^nd respondent in P.T.R.2932/2011/D1421/239/20 -20 dated 19.03.2012, P.T.R. 2932/2011/D1421/239a/20 -20, dated 19.03.2012, and P.T.R2932/2011/D1421/239c/20 -20, dated 19.03.2012, subdividing the lands in S.Nos.313/19, S.No.317/1, S.No.82/1, Kanjarengal Village,

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

3 rd

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.13571 of 2013

¶17

Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District and granting individual patta to the 3^rd respondent herein and quash the same and consequentially direct the 3^rd respondent to approach the appropriate civil Court to establish her claim for the aforesaid land.

¶18

For Petitioner :Mr.A.L.Kannan For Respondents :Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 :Mr.S.Srinivasa Ragavan for R3

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶21

2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned

¶22

counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶23

13.12.2022

¶24

Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order sbn

¶25

Page 2 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD)No.13571 of 2013

¶28

¶29

1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶30

2.The Tahsildhar, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶31

Page 3 of 4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD)No.13571 of 2013

¶34

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶35

sbn

¶36

W.P.(MD)No.13571 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 & 1 of 2014

¶37

13.12.2022

¶38

Page 4 of 4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V. Rajendiran, v. the District Revenue

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Rajendiran, v. the District Revenue

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Chidambaram, Vs the Secretary to Government

N.Kanishkar Nagalingam Vs the District Collector

C.Lawrence Vs the Additional Chief

Duraisingam, Vs the Sub Registrar

P. Kumaravel, Vs the Managing Director

Palanisami, Vs the District Collector