Kannan.a v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of a charge memo was admitted but subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner upon permission being granted.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
W.P(MD)No.13480 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.11.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.13480 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.9573 & 9575 of 2022
A.Kannan ... Petitioner
Vs
- 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,
- 119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Thousands Lights West, Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 034.
- 2.The Joint Commissioner,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Kannan
- respondent
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Trichy District
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Thanjavur District
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Pudukkottai District
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court