This full bench disposed of a writ petition challenging an election notification for Jammad and committee members. The court directed the petitioner to seek relief from the Wakf Tribunal under Section 83 of the Act rather than quashing the notice immediately.
Liberty granted to approach the Wakf Tribunal for grievances; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.12637 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
W.P.(MD)No.12637 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.8951 and 8953 of 2022
.. Petitioners
Vs
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating
1/6
W.P.(MD)No.12637 of 2022
to the impugned election notification issued by the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.Gs:210/Trichy/Va.Ka/The.A/2022 dated 26.05.2022 and quash
the same as illegal and arbitrary and further direct to select the committee members as per the agreement made first respondent and the Jamath Moideen Aandavar Jumma Pallivasal, Thuvarankurichi, Trichy District.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.C.Ramalingam For R2 : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate For R1 and R3 : Mr.K.K.Senthil Standing Counsel
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed to quash the impugned election notification issued by the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.Gs: 210/Trichy/Va.Ka/The.A/2022, dated 26.05.2022 and further to direct and select the committee members as per the agreement made first respondent and the Jamath Moideen Aandavar Jumma Pallivasal, Thuvarankurichi, Trichy District.
2/6
W.P.(MD)No.12637 of 2022
2.The petitioner had sent a representation, dated 08.06.2022 to the third respondent and copy to the other respondents. The contention of the representation is that the Jammath and committee in the Mohideen Aandavar Pallivasal, shall be selected, and a election notification, dated 26.05.2022 had been issued. In the year 1917, the Pallivasal and Jammad
have created and the same has been functioning by nominating the Jammad and committee members from their village. Thereafter, in the year 1955, Pallivasal and the Jammad were handed over to the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board and registered under the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board and assigned serial number as S.No.172, as per the agreement between the Wakf Board and Jammad. As per the agreement in Clause (10), the rule of succession to the post of Muthavalli is by nomination by the Muslims
of the locality. Now suddenly election notice was issued, which is against the undertaking given by the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board. Hence, the present writ petition.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 3 submitted that it is a Wakf Board, which had the authority to conduct the
3/6
W.P.(MD)No.12637 of 2022
election following the Wakf Rules. As per the orders of Tamil Nadu Wakf Board in No.8026/12/Aa5/Trichy, dated 22.10.2021, the election for Jammad and executive members to be conducted by way of secret ballot system and the provisional electoral roll published on 11.01.2022. Thereafter, the election notification has been issued on 26.05.2022. As per the notification, the final electoral list published on 25.06.2022 and filing of nomination on 07.06.2022 and 09.06.2022, the nomination papers are scrutinized and final list candidate will be announced on the same day. The last date of withdrawal of nomination is on 14.06.2022 upto 3.00 p.m and the election of polling will be conducted on 26.06.2022. Now, the petitioner approached and election procedure is almost completed and only election has to be conducted on 26.06.2022. He further submitted that if at all the petitioner has got any grievance, he has to approach the Tribunal under Section 83 of the Wakf Act. The Honourabel Apex Court decision had reiterated in the case of Board of Wakf, West Bengal and another Vs. Anis Fatma Begum and another reported in (2010) 14 Supreme Court Cases 588.
4/6
W.P.(MD)No.12637 of 2022
4.In view of the same, if the petitioner has any grievance, it is for the petitioner to approach the Wakf Tribunal and it has to resolve the dispute under Section 83 of Act. The petitioner is given liberty to approach the Wakf Tribunal to make his submission, if any objections whatever.
5.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed.
21.06.2022
Index: Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vsg To:
The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.
5/6
W.P.(MD)No.12637 of 2022
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
vsg
W.P.(MD)No.12637 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.8951 and 8953 of 2022
21.06.2022
6/6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the election notification for Jammad and committee members should be quashed immediately or for the petitioner to approach the Wakf Tribunal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Board of Wakf, West Bengal and another Vs. Anis Fatma Begum and anotherReferred¶37
(2010) 14 Supreme Court Cases 588
M. Shajahan and others
The Chief Executive Officer, Tamilnadu Wakf Board, Chennai
The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy
The Wakf Board Superintendent/Executive Officer, Tamilnadu Wakf Board, Trichy District
M. Nirmal Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
