Dismissed

Shenbagavalli, v. the Commissioner

Madras HC21 Apr 2022WP(MD)/11983/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged the transfer of tax assessment to a third respondent while a civil suit regarding property rights was pending. Court noted pending second appeal and disposed of petition with liberty to approach court after appeal's disposal.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with liberty to petitioner to work out remedy after disposal of second appeal S.A(MD)No.864 of 2008.

Shenbagavalli, Vs the Commissioner — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated: 21.04.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2009

Shenbagavalli

... Petitioner

1.The Commissioner, Kovilpatti Municipality, Kovilpatti.

¶11

2.The Chairman, Kovilpatti Municipality, Kovilpatti.

¶12

3.P.S.A.Rajaguru ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records relating to proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.9526/2009/C2, dated 07.10.2009 and quash the same as illegal and further directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to restore the name of the petitioner in respect of the assessment of tax in respect of the property in Door No.81 A, 81 B, 87, 88, 89 and 90 in Pillaiyar Koil Street, Kovilpatti.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondent : Mr.Palanivelayutham No.1 For Respondent : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, No.2 Special Government Pleader For Respondent : No representation No.3

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This writ petition is filed as against the order passed by the Commissioner of Kovilpatti Municipality in favour of the third respondent.

¶17

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that when the issue with regard to the right over the property is pending in the civil suit, the first respondent transferred the assessment in the name of the a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009

¶20

dead person and two others, without even providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶21

3.The learned Counsel for the respondent Municipality submits that the assessment was transferred pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 24.04.2008 in A.S.No.69 of 207 on the file of the Sub Court, Kovilpatti.

¶22

4.The petitioner is the fifth defendant in the suit and as against the judgment and decree dated 24.04.2008, the petitioner has filed second appeal in S.A(MD)No.864 of 2008.

¶23

5.The learned Counsel on either side in the second appeal are not ready to proceed with the second appeal.

¶24

6.Considering that the writ petition is filed in the year 2009 as against transfer of assessment in favour of the third respondent made in pursuance of the judgment and decree of the Sub Court, Kovilpatti in A.S.No.69 of 2007 and the issue is now pending in S.A (MD)No.864 of 2008, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy, after the disposal of second appeal in S.A(MD)No.864 of 2008. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶27

dsk

¶28

¶29

1.The Commissioner, Kovilpatti Municipality, Kovilpatti.

¶30

2.The Chairman, Kovilpatti Municipality, Kovilpatti.

¶31

COPY TO:

¶32

The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶33

+1 CC to M/s.M.P. SENTHIL, Advocate ( SR-20690[F] dated 22/04/2022 ) W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009 21.04.2022

¶34

RD(02.06.2022) 2P 5C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/2

Shenbagavalli, v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shenbagavalli, v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Ponnusamy, Vs the Principal District Judte

K.Natarajan Vs the Assistant Commissioner

V.Sathyanathan, Vs the District Collector

Ramasubban @ Ramji, Vs District Revenue Officer

A.Navamani, Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

R.Umayavel Arumuganathan Vs the Joint Director