Writ petition challenging temple festival decisions was dismissed due to non-appearance by the petitioner. The court did not adjudicate the substantive prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.05.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN WP(MD)No.11041 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD)No.8404 of 2019
M.Chinnamuniyandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi Sub Division, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Tahsildar, Vembakkottai, Virudhunagar District. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattur Sub Division, Virudhunagar District. 5. The Inspector of Police, Vembakkottai Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 6. The Sub Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 7. Muthuveerappan 8. V.Natarajan ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 6 to forbear the 7th and 8th respondents, their men and agents from performing kumbabisekam or conducting the temple festival of Arulmigu Sri Kaliamman Temple situated at Sundankulam Village, Alangulam, Vembakkottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District as against the orders of the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge, Sivakasi dated 07.09.2015 in I.A.No.40/2015 in A.S.No.13/2015 and ensure the peaceful worship of the temple by the village people by providing police protection in all auspicious and other days.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 to R6 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R7 : Mr.M.Kannan
2
O R D E R
When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 22.05.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today (30.05.2019).
2.Today also, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
sd/
Deputy Registrar(accounts)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi Sub Division, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Tahsildar, Vembakkottai, Virudhunagar District.
4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattur Sub Division, Virudhunagar District.
5.The Inspector of Police, Vembakkottai Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
6.The Sub Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
WP(MD)No.11041 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD)No.8404 of 2019 30.05.2019 vsd/vs
MK (07.06.2019) 2P 7C
M. Chinnamuniyandi
The District Collector, Virudhunagar
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi Sub Division
The Tahsildar, Vembakkottai
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattur Sub Division
The Inspector of Police, Vembakkottai Police Station
R. Pongiappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
