N.Kannan v. the Special Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
A petition for a Rayatwari patta filed under Article 226 is closed as the petitioner is seeking remedy pending in a separate writ appeal before the Division Bench.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted liberty to work out remedy in pending writ appeal; writ petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.10659 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 18.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)No.10659 of 2010 and MP(MD) No.3 of 2010 N.Kannan ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai -5.
- The Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement, Chepauk, Chennai – 5.
- The Settlement Officer, Office of Special Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement, Chepauk, Chennai – 5.
- The Assistant Settlement Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.
- The District Forest Officer, Theni District, Theni.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N. Kannan
- respondent
The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration
- respondent
The Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement
- respondent
The Settlement Officer
- respondent
The Assistant Settlement Officer
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court