P.Vasantha v. the Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the argument that the petitioner's endorsement indicated the matter was no longer cause for judicial intervention.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
W.P(MD).No.10464 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P.(MD)No.10464 of 2016 and
W.M.P(MD) No.8158 of 2016
P.Vasantha
... Petitioner
-vs-
- The Registrar, Bharathidasan University, Trichirapalli – 620 024.
- The Chair Person, Department Research Committee, PG & Research Department of Commerce, Sri Venkateswara College of Arts and Science, Peravurani, Thanjavur District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Vasantha
- respondent
The Registrar, Bharathidasan University, Trichirapalli
- respondent
The Chair Person, Department Research Committee, PG & Research Department of Commerce, Sri Venkateswara College of Arts and Science
- respondent
Dr. S. Rajkumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court