Dismissed

V.Maheswari v. District Collector (Revenue)

Madras HC26 Sept 2022WP/8730/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the deceased petitioner challenging the allotment of houses to other respondents, observing that the petitioner had died. An order grants liberty to the legal representatives to file a fresh writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to file fresh writ petition as legal representatives; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

V.Maheswari Vs District Collector (Revenue) — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.8730 of 2011

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 26.09.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No. 8730 of 2011 M.P.Nos. 1 & 2 of 2011

V.Maheswari

.. Petitioner

Vs.

District Collector (Revenue), Revenue Department, Puducherry.

¶11

Tahsildar, Oulgaret Taluk,

¶12

Puducherry.

¶13

Maheswari @ Ettaya

¶14

Pugazhselvi

¶15

Mythili

¶16

Mohan

¶17

Divya

¶18

Gomathy

¶19

Selvarasi

¶20

Thamilarasi

¶21

Govindammal .. Respondents

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

1/4

¶24

W.P.No.8730 of 2011

¶25

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent with No.Nil dated Nil regarding the list of Tsunami affected villagers at Chinna Kalapet hamlet and the allotment of houses to the respondents 3 to 11 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to allot and handover house No.74 to the petitioner on the basis of the earlier allotment in which the petitioner was granted Plot No.74.

¶26

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ajayakumar

¶27

For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs.V.Usha AGP (Pondy)

¶28

¶29

O R D E R

¶30

This writ petition has been filed challenging the list of Tsunami affected villagers at Chinna Kalapet hamlet and the allotment of houses to the respondents 3 to 11 and further seeks a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to allot and handover house No.74 to the petitioner on the basis of the earlier allotment in which the petitioner was granted Plot No.74.

¶31

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that

¶32

the petitioner has died and the Legal Representatives of the petitioner have

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

2/4

¶35

W.P.No.8730 of 2011

¶36

applied for Legal Heir Certificate and therefore seeks liberty to the LRs of the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition.

¶37

Such view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed, however,

¶38

with liberty to the LRs of the petitioner to file fresh writ petition as per law.

¶39

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

26.09.2022

District Collector (Revenue), Revenue Department, Puducherry.

¶44

Tahsildar, Oulgaret Taluk, Puducherry.

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

3/4

¶47

W.P.No.8730 of 2011

¶48

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶49

¶50

W.P.No.8730 of 2011 M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2011

¶51

26.09.2022

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

4/4

V.Maheswari v. District Collector (Revenue)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Maheswari v. District Collector (Revenue)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hector Rozario Vs The State of Tamilnadu

B.Venkatesh Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Dr.R.Jayasankar Vs the Union of India

Muthu Memorial Educational Vs National Council for Teacher

M/S.B.Muthulakshmi & Co., Vs Tamilnadu Generation and

A.Ravi, Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.